Subject: Re: [boost] [threadpool] relation with TR2 proposal
Date: 2008-09-12 14:14:37
Am Freitag, 12. September 2008 13:24:14 schrieb joaquin_at_[hidden]:
> k-oli_at_[hidden] escribiÃ³:
> > Am Freitag, 12. September 2008 10:52:50 schrieb joaquin_at_[hidden]:
> >> Hello,
> >> I learnt yesterday that there is a TR2 proposal for a thread_pool,
> >> sponsored by
> >> our Boost colleague Anthony Williams:
> >> http://www2.open-std.org/JTC1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2007/n2276.html
> >> What is the relationship with this proposal of the threadpool library
> >> that is being
> >> discussed these days here at the Boost list?
> >> Thank you,
> >> JoaquÃn M LÃ³pez MuÃ±oz
> >> TelefÃ³nica, InvestigaciÃ³n y Desarrollo
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Unsubscribe & other changes:
> >> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
> > The threadpool lib in the vault has no relation to the TR2 proposal.
> > It seams that Anthonys lib is simple - no support for task interruption,
> > lazy task evaluation or task chanining, channel and queue types etc.
> It'd be an odd thing if we had a TR2 threadpool lib and a different lib
> in Boost (assuming
> both proposals are succesful). Shoudln't there be some some syncing
> between the
> respective authors?
What about the future libs (see review schedule)? Anthonys proposal in TR2 and
BRaddocks implementation are also not in sync?!
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk