Subject: Re: [boost] [UUID] Still alive?
From: Hartmut Kaiser (hartmut.kaiser_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-09-14 10:16:37
> On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 19:16:24 +0200, Hartmut Kaiser
> <hartmut.kaiser_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > [...]IIRC, all what's left to be done is to request a mini-review for
> > the parts
> > criticized during the review. Updating the docs to use the quickbook
> I see. Then I should find out what these parts are, check them myself
> - if I think they have been fixed the way the reviewers agreed on in
> 2007 - request a mini review?
The two things criticized were (as mentioned in the review decision):
- incompatible license for parts of the code
- security problem with the initial random generator implementation
Andy already addressed a lot of other review comments (such as adding
serialization support, performance improvements, etc.). AFAIR, the only
thing really missing was the mini review. Code-wise everything should be
> > format
> > might be another thing, but this is not mandatory.
> The docs are HTML files - or do you know if they have been generated
> another format than quickbook?
Yes, it's HTML.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk