Subject: Re: [boost] [log] RFC: An alternative implementation is coming up
From: vicente.botet (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-09-23 14:50:47
----- Original Message -----
From: "Andrey Semashev" <andrey.semashev_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Saturday, August 02, 2008 9:05 PM
Subject: [boost] [log] RFC: An alternative implementation is coming up
> I would like to see what Boost community thinks of this library, whether
> it worth submitting, has any critical flaws or any other thoughts.
> I also would appreciate if Gennadiy Rozental and John Torjo expressed
> their thoughts on possibility to review this library in parallel with
> John's solution, which is currently in the review queue. I would gladly
> discuss this privately, if they find it more suitable.
Is this a formal review request?
BTW, which is the John's solution that will be review (for the moment I see
only log2 which was already rejected)?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk