Re: [boost] [log] RFC: An alternative implementation is coming up

Subject: Re: [boost] [log] RFC: An alternative implementation is coming up
From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-09-23 16:11:58

vicente.botet wrote:
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andrey Semashev"
> <andrey.semashev_at_[hidden]>
> To: <boost_at_[hidden]>
> Sent: Saturday, August 02, 2008 9:05 PM
> Subject: [boost] [log] RFC: An alternative implementation is coming up
> 
> 
>> I would like to see what Boost community thinks of this library,
>> whether it worth submitting, has any critical flaws or any other
>> thoughts.
>>
>> I also would appreciate if Gennadiy Rozental and John Torjo expressed
>> their thoughts on possibility to review this library in parallel with
>> John's solution, which is currently in the review queue. I would
>> gladly discuss this privately, if they find it more suitable.
> 
> Hi Andrey,
> 
> Is this a formal review request?

No, not yet. There are some issues I would like to address before the
review. However, I plan to request a formal review this winter.

> BTW, which is the John's solution that will be review (for the moment I
> see only log2 which was already rejected)?

There's another request in the review queue. Essentially, this should be
an updated version of the rejected library. Unfortunately, I haven't got
any feedback from John or Gennadiy, so I can't tell anything else about it.