Subject: Re: [boost] request for interest: stable vector
From: Emil Dotchevski (emil_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-09-26 14:25:03
On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 8:01 AM, Joaquin M Lopez Munoz <joaquin_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Emil Dotchevski <emil <at> revergestudios.com> writes:
>> On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 9:42 AM, JOAQUIN M. LOPEZ MUÑOZ <joaquin <at> tid.es>
> Hi Emil, as promised, some profile results are shown at:
This is interesting, so basically the stable iterators/references are
achieved by allocating each object in a separate node.
This got me thinking, from certain point of view the difference
between std::list and your stable_vector is the ability of the latter
to return elements by index in O(1). Isn't it possible to decouple
this ability from the container itself? In other words, could your
code be refactored to provide indexing over any type of "host
OTOH, I'm guessing that the only type of "host container" that would
make sense is std::list, since the other "stable containers" don't
preserve the ordering between the elements (which makes indexing
impractical) so maybe it isn't worth the effort.
Reverge Studios, Inc.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk