Re: [boost] phoenix::bind

Subject: Re: [boost] phoenix::bind
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-10-03 14:40:40

AMDG

Peter Dimov wrote:
> Eh. How about this one:
>
>    lambda(_x, _y)[ let. _z = _x + _y, _z * _z ]
>
> I think that the implicit let will be much less of an issue in a 
> lambda context than it is in Python (or Javascript), though.

Doesn't that imply that _a, _b, ... have to be enumerated in the 
definition of let?

I like to have the possibility of defining new local variable names.

In Christ,
Steven Watanabe