Subject: Re: [boost] phoenix::bind
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-10-03 14:40:40
Peter Dimov wrote:
> Eh. How about this one:
> lambda(_x, _y)[ let. _z = _x + _y, _z * _z ]
> I think that the implicit let will be much less of an issue in a
Doesn't that imply that _a, _b, ... have to be enumerated in the
definition of let?
I like to have the possibility of defining new local variable names.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk