Subject: Re: [boost] phoenix::bind
From: Joel de Guzman (joel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-10-03 19:47:21
Steven Watanabe wrote:
> Peter Dimov wrote:
>> Eh. How about this one:
>> lambda(_x, _y)[ let. _z = _x + _y, _z * _z ]
>> I think that the implicit let will be much less of an issue in a
> Doesn't that imply that _a, _b, ... have to be enumerated in the
> definition of let?
Not sure I understand.
> I like to have the possibility of defining new local variable names.
Oh sure you can define new names in Phoenix:
actor<local_variable<size_key> > size;
Is that what you mean?
-- Joel de Guzman http://www.boostpro.com http://spirit.sf.net
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk