Subject: Re: [boost] [config] Any reason not to enable long long support in for Sun's compiler?
From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-10-07 12:12:45
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 8:42 AM, John Maddock <john_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Title says it all really, any reason why I should define
> BOOST_HAS_LONG_LONG for sun's compiler? Seems to all work OK...
It is pretty hard to imagine a compiler that doesn't support long long
as a type, although some compilers were a bit slower about providing
long long overloads for library functions.
I'd say go ahead and see what happens.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk