Re: [boost] [config] Any reason not to enable long long support in for Sun's compiler?

Subject: Re: [boost] [config] Any reason not to enable long long support in for Sun's compiler?
From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-10-07 12:12:45

On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 8:42 AM, John Maddock <john_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Title says it all really,  any reason why I should define
> BOOST_HAS_LONG_LONG for sun's compiler?  Seems to all work OK...

It is pretty hard to imagine a compiler that doesn't support long long
as a type, although some compilers were a bit slower about providing
long long overloads for library functions.

I'd say go ahead and see what happens.

--Beman