Subject: Re: [boost] [config] Any reason not to enable long long support infor Sun's compiler?
From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-10-07 13:24:31
Beman Dawes wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 8:42 AM, John Maddock
>> <john_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>> Title says it all really, any reason why I should define
>>> BOOST_HAS_LONG_LONG for sun's compiler? Seems to all work OK...
>> It is pretty hard to imagine a compiler that doesn't support long
>> as a type, although some compilers were a bit slower about providing
>> long long overloads for library functions.
>> I'd say go ahead and see what happens.
Nod, done, if there's any fallout I'll revert.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk