Re: [boost] [config] Any reason not to enable long long support infor Sun's compiler?

Subject: Re: [boost] [config] Any reason not to enable long long support infor Sun's compiler?
From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-10-07 13:24:31

Beman Dawes wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 8:42 AM, John Maddock
>> <john_at_[hidden]> wrote: 
>>> Title says it all really,  any reason why I should define
>>> BOOST_HAS_LONG_LONG for sun's compiler?  Seems to all work OK...
>> 
>> It is pretty hard to imagine a compiler that doesn't support long
>> long 
>> as a type, although some compilers were a bit slower about providing
>> long long overloads for library functions.
>> 
>> I'd say go ahead and see what happens.

Nod, done, if there's any fallout I'll revert.

John.