Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] [mp_int] new release
From: Kim Barrett (kab.conundrums_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-10-08 17:40:48

Next message: Michael Fawcett: "Re: [boost] Geometry and spatial indexes, my opinion"
Previous message: Patrick Mihelich: "Re: [boost] Geometry and spatial indexes, my opinion"
In reply to: Scott McMurray: "Re: [boost] [mp_int] new release"
Next in thread: Brandon Kohn: "Re: [boost] [mp_int] new release"

At 11:10 AM -0400 10/8/08, Scott McMurray wrote:
> >> I personally find the words arbitrary precision or multiprecision
> >> ambiguous.
>
>How about unbounded_int? It fits nicely with the is_bounded in
>numeric_limits.

Personally, I'm a fan of "integer".

Next message: Michael Fawcett: "Re: [boost] Geometry and spatial indexes, my opinion"
Previous message: Patrick Mihelich: "Re: [boost] Geometry and spatial indexes, my opinion"
In reply to: Scott McMurray: "Re: [boost] [mp_int] new release"
Next in thread: Brandon Kohn: "Re: [boost] [mp_int] new release"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk