Subject: Re: [boost] tie alternative?
From: Johan Torp (johan.torp_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-10-27 02:58:57
David Abrahams-3 wrote:
> for (vertex_iterator pv,ve = xxx(pv,vertices(g)); pv != ve; ++pv)
> My only problem is how to spell xxx. The attached proof-of-concept uses
> operator%, but I don't feel particularly good about that choice either.
unpack or expand perhaps.
Best Regards, Johan Torp
-- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/tie-alternative--tp20181162p20182634.html Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk