Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] tie alternative?
From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-10-27 07:27:56

on Mon Oct 27 2008, Johan Torp <> wrote:

> David Abrahams-3 wrote:
>> for (vertex_iterator pv,ve = xxx(pv,vertices(g)); pv != ve; ++pv)
>> {
>> ...
>> }
>> My only problem is how to spell xxx. The attached proof-of-concept uses
>> operator%, but I don't feel particularly good about that choice either.
>> Ideas?
> unpack or expand perhaps.

Yeah, but that's a bit too long and not quite evocative enough. I'm
setting the first argument (an out parameter) to the first element of
the pair and returning the second one.

Dave Abrahams
BoostPro Computing

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at