Re: [boost] tie alternative?

Subject: Re: [boost] tie alternative?
From: Michael G (mgoldshteyn_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-10-27 11:15:31

"David Abrahams" <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
news:877i7uivdq.fsf_at_mcbain.luannocracy.com...
> ...
> However, we can make it much nicer, e.g.:
>
>  for (vertex_iterator pv,ve = xxx(pv,vertices(g)); pv != ve; ++pv)
>  {
>      ...
>  }
>
> My only problem is how to spell xxx.  The attached proof-of-concept uses
> operator%, but I don't feel particularly good about that choice either.
> Ideas?

I would recommend one of the following, depending on your verbosity comfort
level. The vertical bar, | , denotes alternation:

(get|as|to)_iterators
get_container_bounds

Thanks,

Michael Goldshteyn