Subject: Re: [boost] tie alternative?
From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-10-27 17:28:48
on Mon Oct 27 2008, "Michael G" <mgoldshteyn-AT-comcast.net> wrote:
> "David Abrahams" <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
>> However, we can make it much nicer, e.g.:
>> for (vertex_iterator pv,ve = xxx(pv,vertices(g)); pv != ve; ++pv)
>> My only problem is how to spell xxx. The attached proof-of-concept uses
>> operator%, but I don't feel particularly good about that choice either.
> I would recommend one of the following, depending on your verbosity comfort
> level. The vertical bar, | , denotes alternation:
Again, quite verbose. But maybe BOOST_FOREACH is the right answer
anyway; I don't know.
-- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk