Re: [boost] llvm anyone?

Subject: Re: [boost] llvm anyone?
From: Sebastian Redl (sebastian.redl_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-11-13 10:47:53

Mathias Gaunard wrote:
> Doug Gregor wrote:
>> Clang is a compiler [...] with an easy-to-modify modern
>> C++ code base
>
> Clang and LLVM are certainly not coded with what I would call a modern 
> C++ design or Boost-like however.
The LLVM coding guideline speaks of "a tasteful subset of C++". What 
they mean is code that people coming from C and other non-C++ languages 
can grasp reasonably fast. (Or at least that's my interpretation.)

No, it most definitely isn't Boost-like. :-)

Sebastian