Subject: Re: [boost] llvm anyone?
From: Sebastian Redl (sebastian.redl_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-11-13 10:47:53
Mathias Gaunard wrote:
> Doug Gregor wrote:
>> Clang is a compiler [...] with an easy-to-modify modern
>> C++ code base
> Clang and LLVM are certainly not coded with what I would call a modern
> C++ design or Boost-like however.
The LLVM coding guideline speaks of "a tasteful subset of C++". What
they mean is code that people coming from C and other non-C++ languages
can grasp reasonably fast. (Or at least that's my interpretation.)
No, it most definitely isn't Boost-like. :-)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk