Subject: Re: [boost] [function] minor doc issues
From: Thorsten Ottosen (thorsten.ottosen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-11-19 15:20:08
Steven Watanabe skrev:
> Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
>> // if ResultType is void
>> ResultType foo(Arg1 arg1, Arg2 arg2, ..., ArgN argN)
>> f(arg1, arg2, ..., argN);
>> I believe the "If ResultType is void" is not needed. We can return
>> void in C++.
Hm. Right, but I did get that from reading the docs. That could be said
more directly IMO. And the fix to the code would be to say
would that not "swallow the return value" too?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk