Re: [boost] [function] minor doc issues

Subject: Re: [boost] [function] minor doc issues
From: Thorsten Ottosen (thorsten.ottosen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-11-19 15:20:08

Steven Watanabe skrev:
> AMDG
> 
> Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
>>   // if ResultType is void
>>   ResultType foo(Arg1 arg1, Arg2 arg2, ..., ArgN argN)
>>   {
>>     f(arg1, arg2, ..., argN);
>>   }
>>
>> I believe the "If ResultType is void" is not needed. We can return 
>> void in C++.
> 
> http://www.boost.org/doc/html/function/faq.html#id2914425

Hm. Right, but I did get that from reading the docs. That could be said 
more directly IMO. And the fix to the code would be to say

  return static_cast<ResultType>(f(arg1,....))

would that not "swallow the return value" too?

-Thorsten