Re: [boost] [function] minor doc issues

Subject: Re: [boost] [function] minor doc issues
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-11-19 16:04:05

AMDG

Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
> Hm. Right, but I did get that from reading the docs. That could be 
> said more directly IMO. And the fix to the code would be to say
>
>  return static_cast<ResultType>(f(arg1,....))
>
> would that not "swallow the return value" too?

It would also allow explicit conversions:

int f() { return 1; }

boost::function<std::vector<double>() > func(&f);

In Christ,
Steven Watanabe