Re: [boost] [unicode] Interest Check / Proof of Concept

Subject: Re: [boost] [unicode] Interest Check / Proof of Concept
From: James Porter (porterj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-11-19 17:40:03

James Porter wrote:
> This is probably workable. Do you envision something like the following?
> 
>     my_string.encode(source,utf8());
> 
> It would have the benefit of making the interface for ct_strings and 
> rt_strings the same. For ct_strings, it would specialize on the type of 
> the encoding parameter, and for rt_strings, it would wrap the encoding 
> up in some object to give it virtual dispatch.

I read through this again, and it doesn't actually make sense. 
ct_strings would never need an encoding specified. Nevermind!

- Jim