Re: [boost] Boost.Future & review of C++0x accepted libraries implementations

Subject: Re: [boost] Boost.Future & review of C++0x accepted libraries implementations
From: k-oli_at_[hidden]
Date: 2008-11-20 11:51:10

Am Donnerstag, 20. November 2008 15:37:10 schrieb vicente.botet:
> Hi,
>
> The Anthony Future + Packaged task proposals have been adopted by the C++
> Standard.

good you post a link to this information, please.

> Is there a sense to review both Futures libraries together?
> Can we accept the Braddock library if it not conforms to the standard?

That's the question - Braddocks Future library has more features (callback 
functionality).

> As the interface and the design rationale for libraries already adopted by
> the C++ Standard such Chrono seem to be out of the scope of a review, which
> is the contents expected for such libraries to be adopted? Do we need a
> different review process?
>
> BTW, the threadpool library uses Braddock Future library.

I can easily exchange the future implementation - chaining tasks and lazy task 
evaluation will not be available with the lib from Anthony.

reagards,
Oliver