Subject: Re: [boost] Is Boost.Range broken?
From: Daniel James (daniel_james_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-11-23 05:36:48
2008/11/23 Tomas Puverle <Tomas.Puverle_at_[hidden]>:
> Hence we need two different implementations. That is exactly what I
There's no reason that they both have to be in boost. Boost range
should let you use your own range class.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk