Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [Boost-users] Maintenace Guidelines wiki page
From: vicente.botet (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-11-23 07:01:14

----- Original Message -----
From: "Henrik Sundberg" <storangen_at_[hidden]>
To: <boost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2008 12:18 PM
Subject: Re: [boost] [Boost-users] Maintenace Guidelines wiki page

> On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 11:29 AM, vicente.botet
> <vicente.botet_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> The Daniel proposal implies some changes in the writing rights of the authors. I prefer to let this point out of these guidelines. Of course I think that this is a good idea.
> I think this is absolutely wrong. The authors are the experts and they
> do all work. You should never try to make them inferior. Do not handle
> quality in Boost as in old fashioned handling of "Quality" (which
> *not* is the same as product/code quality) in big companies. There is
> a release management in Boost. The release manager can choose not to
> accept something in the release if something is considered to be too
> bad.

I have never said the contrary.


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at