Subject: Re: [boost] [threadpool] new version - supporting futurelibrary(C++0x) from Anthony Williams
Date: 2008-11-23 10:38:14
Am Sonntag, 23. November 2008 16:26:05 schrieb vicente.botet:
> Sorry for the noise, I belive that you were using the 'Just Solution
> Software' implementation.
Yes - I'm using future library from Anthony Williams (scheduled for boost peer
review). Because the interface seams to become part of C++0x I modifed
boost.threadpool in order to use it.
I hope Anthony will provide its implementation to boost.
The question is (as you already asked) what happens with Braddocks future
library - is a peer review still required? Should Anthonies future lib added
to boost by default?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk