Re: [boost] [threadpool] new version - supporting futurelibrary(C++0x) from Anthony Williams

Subject: Re: [boost] [threadpool] new version - supporting futurelibrary(C++0x) from Anthony Williams
From: Anthony Williams (anthony.ajw_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-11-24 04:05:20

k-oli_at_[hidden] writes:

> Am Sonntag, 23. November 2008 16:26:05 schrieb vicente.botet:
>> Sorry for the noise, I belive that you were using the 'Just Solution
>> Software' implementation.
>
> Yes - I'm using future library from Anthony Williams (scheduled for boost peer 
> review). Because the interface seams to become part of C++0x I modifed 
> boost.threadpool in order to use it.

Note that the (Boost-licensed) implementation you've used is based on
N2561, which is an older proposal than the one that was finally accepted.

> I hope Anthony will provide its implementation to boost.
> The question is (as you already asked) what happens with Braddocks future 
> library - is a peer review still required? Should Anthonies future lib added 
> to boost by default?

The future libraries (mine + Braddock's) are due for Boost review in January.

Anthony
-- 
Anthony Williams
Author of C++ Concurrency in Action | http://www.manning.com/williams
Custom Software Development | http://www.justsoftwaresolutions.co.uk
Just Software Solutions Ltd, Registered in England, Company Number 5478976.
Registered Office: 15 Carrallack Mews, St Just, Cornwall, TR19 7UL, UK