|
|
Boost : |
Subject: Re: [boost] [interprocess] default constructors
From: Ion Gaztañaga (igaztanaga_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-11-29 17:42:24
Jan Stetka wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there any reason why named_mutex and managed_shared_memory don't have
> a default constructor?
Because in the review the two step construction (default ctor + open())
was considered harmful. I guess now it would be useful in the presence
of move semantics. Is that your intended use case?
Regards,
Ion
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk