Re: [boost] [interprocess] default constructors

Subject: Re: [boost] [interprocess] default constructors
From: Mathias Gaunard (mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-11-30 07:11:03

Ion Gaztañaga wrote:

> Because in the review the two step construction (default ctor + open()) 
> was considered harmful. I guess now it would be useful in the presence 
> of move semantics.

If you implement move as swap, there is no problem at all.
You could still implement move as transfer, leaving the moved-from 
object in some state where only destruction and assignment are valid; 
there is no need to make that state reachable from public 
default-construction.