Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] Breaking existing libraries
From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-12-03 12:11:36

on Mon Nov 24 2008, "Henrik Sundberg" <> wrote:

> On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 4:40 PM, Thorsten Ottosen
>> The library changed after its original form, and into something much better.
>> And the change was motivated by real user feedback, something which the
>> original review in some sense could not provide as much of.
> This relates to another thread. Should libraries be marked as
> stable/experimental?

I like it, but I would prefer stable/new. Libraries that aren't new
shouldn't be unstable, and rewrites would make the library "new" again.

Dave Abrahams
BoostPro Computing

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at