Subject: Re: [boost] Breaking existing libraries
From: Stefan Seefeld (seefeld_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-12-03 17:30:28
David Abrahams wrote:
> on Mon Nov 24 2008, "Henrik Sundberg" <storangen-AT-gmail.com> wrote:
>> This relates to another thread. Should libraries be marked as
> I like it, but I would prefer stable/new. Libraries that aren't new
> shouldn't be unstable, and rewrites would make the library "new" again.
This raises the obvious question: Where do you trace the line between a
minor change ('fix') and a rewrite ? And how do you enforce it ?
-- ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk