Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] Is there a special reason to use inline before template functions?
From: Michael Marcin (mike.marcin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-12-08 12:11:37

Next message: Michael Marcin: "Re: [boost] Is there a special reason to use inline before template functions?"
Previous message: Michael Marcin: "Re: [boost] Composing non copyable and movable classes"
In reply to: Thomas Klimpel: "[boost] Is there a special reason to use inline before template functions?"
Next in thread: Brian Ravnsgaard Riis: "Re: [boost] Is there a special reason to use inline before template functions?"
Reply: Brian Ravnsgaard Riis: "Re: [boost] Is there a special reason to use inline before template functions?"

Thomas Klimpel wrote:
> I would expect that current compilers know better when inlining a function provides a benefit than the programmer.

They don't.

-- 
Michael Marcin

Next message: Michael Marcin: "Re: [boost] Is there a special reason to use inline before template functions?"
Previous message: Michael Marcin: "Re: [boost] Composing non copyable and movable classes"
In reply to: Thomas Klimpel: "[boost] Is there a special reason to use inline before template functions?"
Next in thread: Brian Ravnsgaard Riis: "Re: [boost] Is there a special reason to use inline before template functions?"
Reply: Brian Ravnsgaard Riis: "Re: [boost] Is there a special reason to use inline before template functions?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk