Re: [boost] Is there a special reason to use inline before template functions?

Subject: Re: [boost] Is there a special reason to use inline before template functions?
From: Michael Marcin (mike.marcin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-12-08 12:12:04

Andrey Semashev wrote:
> 
> I didn't look at the code, but if these member functions are declared in
> the class definition, they are already inline and this keyword is not
> needed.

Some compilers disable default inlining under certain configurations. 
GCC has -fno-default-inline for instance. Some libraries might 
explicitly put inline there to support these configurations.

-- 
Michael Marcin