Subject: Re: [boost] [review][constrained_value] Review of Constrained Value Library begins today
From: Robert Kawulak (robert.kawulak_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-12-08 19:13:17
> From: Thorsten Ottosen
> > It's not portability that has been the main concern here.
> It is the very small
> > set of guarantees given by the standard regarding FP
> calculations, lacking some
> > of the natural assumptions everybody has when working with
> FP. Also lacking some
> > of the guarantees that would make preserving the invariant
> of constrained float
> > an easy task.
> It's not the library that can take this decision for the users. The
> library does as much as it can to help the users. It still
> better than
> status quo.
Sorry, I'm not sure if I understand your point here -- could you please rephrase
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk