Subject: Re: [boost] [review][constrained_value] Review of Constrained Value Library begins today
From: Robert Kawulak (robert.kawulak_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-12-09 20:38:25
> From: Thorsten Ottosen
> > Sorry, I'm not sure if I understand your point here --
> could you please rephrase
> > this?
> There is nothing profound here. It's the same thing I been trying to
> communicate for some time. The fact that floating points are
> and tricky is not an argument against putting support for
> in your library. User deal with these problems in ad hoc manners (the
> status quo), and your library can help them with easier
> and clipping etc.
OK, thanks -- now I get it, and after the discussions I agree with this.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk