Subject: Re: [boost] unique_ptr, was: Composing non copyable and movable classes
From: Sebastian Redl (sebastian.redl_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-12-10 16:12:46
Peter Dimov wrote:
> Michael Marcin:
>> Speaking of unique_ptr is it possible to get a C++03 emulation of
>> unique_ptr into boost?
>> I've been using
>> for months and it seems to work fine.
> To get it into Boost, someone needs to contribute the tests and
> documentation and commit to maintaining it. :-)
> That said, I'm not fond of this property of the cited implementation:
> This implementation will mistakenly move from const lvalues.
Howard has an updated version that doesn't do this. The new version is
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk