Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] <build>no in common properties
From: K. Noel Belcourt (kbelco_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-12-14 15:31:40


On Dec 14, 2008, at 1:16 PM, Vladimir Prus wrote:

> K. Noel Belcourt wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> The Sandia-darwin-intel-11.0 results are failing because essentially
>> every Boost product is not being built (actually being skipped).
>> This message is present for almost every Boost library.
>>
>> Skipping build of: ../libs/date_time/test/date_time_serialization
>> <build>no in common properties
>> Skipping build of: ../libs/disjoint_sets/disjoint_sets <build>no in
>> common properties
>> Skipping build of: ../libs/dynamic_bitset/dynamic_bitset <build>no
>> in common properties
>> Skipping build of: ../libs/exception/test/is_output_streamable_test
>> <build>no in common properties
>>
>> Any idea what's up with this? The Sandia-leopard-x86 results didn't
>> seem to suffer from this problem last night.
>
> Can you manually run any of the skipped test, adding --debug-building
> to bjam command line?

Adding this flag generates significantly more detailed output, but it
appears that the same libraries are still being skipped.

-- Noel


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk