Re: [boost] <build>no in common properties

Subject: Re: [boost] <build>no in common properties
From: Vladimir Prus (vladimir_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-12-14 17:02:07

K. Noel Belcourt wrote:

> 
> On Dec 14, 2008, at 1:16 PM, Vladimir Prus wrote:
> 
>> K. Noel Belcourt wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> The Sandia-darwin-intel-11.0 results are failing because essentially
>>> every Boost product is not being built (actually being skipped).
>>> This message is present for almost every Boost library.
>>>
>>> Skipping build of:  ../libs/date_time/test/date_time_serialization
>>> <build>no in common properties
>>> Skipping build of:  ../libs/disjoint_sets/disjoint_sets  <build>no in
>>> common properties
>>> Skipping build of:  ../libs/dynamic_bitset/dynamic_bitset  <build>no
>>> in common properties
>>> Skipping build of:  ../libs/exception/test/is_output_streamable_test
>>> <build>no in common properties
>>>
>>> Any idea what's up with this?  The Sandia-leopard-x86 results didn't
>>> seem to suffer from this problem last night.
>>
>> Can you manually run any of the skipped test, adding --debug-building
>> to bjam command line?
> 
> Adding this flag generates significantly more detailed output, but it
> appears that the same libraries are still being skipped.

Ehm. I forgot to mention that I need that detailed output -- the option
is not supposed to change the behaviour. And for avoidable of doubt --
it's best to get the output for a single test.

- Volodya