Subject: Re: [boost] <build>no in common properties
From: Vladimir Prus (vladimir_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-12-15 01:01:26
K. Noel Belcourt wrote:
>>> Adding this flag generates significantly more detailed output, but it
>>> appears that the same libraries are still being skipped.
>> Ehm. I forgot to mention that I need that detailed output -- the
>> is not supposed to change the behaviour. And for avoidable of doubt --
>> it's best to get the output for a single test.
> Log for algorithm/minmax/test is attached.
Are you explicitling specifying runtime-link=static somewhere? If so, why?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk