Re: [boost] <build>no in common properties

Subject: Re: [boost] <build>no in common properties
From: K. Noel Belcourt (kbelco_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-12-14 17:12:31

On Dec 14, 2008, at 3:02 PM, Vladimir Prus wrote:

> K. Noel Belcourt wrote:
>
>>
>> On Dec 14, 2008, at 1:16 PM, Vladimir Prus wrote:
>>
>>> K. Noel Belcourt wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> The Sandia-darwin-intel-11.0 results are failing because  
>>>> essentially
>>>> every Boost product is not being built (actually being skipped).
>>>> This message is present for almost every Boost library.
>>>>
>>>> Skipping build of:  ../libs/date_time/test/date_time_serialization
>>>> <build>no in common properties
>>>> Skipping build of:  ../libs/disjoint_sets/disjoint_sets   
>>>> <build>no in
>>>> common properties
>>>> Skipping build of:  ../libs/dynamic_bitset/dynamic_bitset   
>>>> <build>no
>>>> in common properties
>>>> Skipping build of:  ../libs/exception/test/ 
>>>> is_output_streamable_test
>>>> <build>no in common properties
>>>>
>>>> Any idea what's up with this?  The Sandia-leopard-x86 results  
>>>> didn't
>>>> seem to suffer from this problem last night.
>>>
>>> Can you manually run any of the skipped test, adding --debug- 
>>> building
>>> to bjam command line?
>>
>> Adding this flag generates significantly more detailed output, but it
>> appears that the same libraries are still being skipped.
>
> Ehm. I forgot to mention that I need that detailed output -- the  
> option
> is not supposed to change the behaviour. And for avoidable of doubt --
> it's best to get the output for a single test.

Log for algorithm/minmax/test is attached.

-- Noel