Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] [boost.build] should we not define _SECURE_SCL=0 by default for all msvc toolsets
From: Edouard A. (edouard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-12-19 08:08:00

Next message: Neal Becker: "[boost] accumulators + complex"
Previous message: Boris: "Re: [boost] Asking for feedback for book (in German) about the Boost C++ libraries"
In reply to: Hansi: "Re: [boost] [boost.build] should we not define _SECURE_SCL=0 by default for all msvc toolsets"
Next in thread: Hansi: "Re: [boost] [boost.build] should we not define _SECURE_SCL=0 by default for all msvc toolsets"
Reply: Hansi: "Re: [boost] [boost.build] should we not define _SECURE_SCL=0 by default for all msvc toolsets"

> I will check it..but I have no experience with bjam...I think it is
> really important because it is a ABI change!!!

I'm not sure but I think you can do something like bjam
cxxflags=-D_SECURE_SCL=0

-- 
EA

Next message: Neal Becker: "[boost] accumulators + complex"
Previous message: Boris: "Re: [boost] Asking for feedback for book (in German) about the Boost C++ libraries"
In reply to: Hansi: "Re: [boost] [boost.build] should we not define _SECURE_SCL=0 by default for all msvc toolsets"
Next in thread: Hansi: "Re: [boost] [boost.build] should we not define _SECURE_SCL=0 by default for all msvc toolsets"
Reply: Hansi: "Re: [boost] [boost.build] should we not define _SECURE_SCL=0 by default for all msvc toolsets"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk