Subject: Re: [boost] [uuid] Interface
From: Scott McMurray (me22.ca+boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-12-21 01:51:46
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 00:38, Vladimir Batov <batov_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> [...] And I am still under
> impression that that requirement (or expectation) cannot be real as many
> classes are not even meant to be comparable. I do not think it makes them
> unusable with the std containers or breaking anything or second-class
> classes of no interest to the Standards committee.
I was careful to say equivalent, not equal, since even when things
don't have any kind of comparison operator, C++03 still has the
requirement that a copy of an object (whether from copy-construction
or assigned) must be equivalent to the original, so the concept is
Anyways, did you have any comments on my view of UUIDs as resource handles?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk