Re: [boost] [constrained] constrained_vector

Subject: Re: [boost] [constrained] constrained_vector
From: Neal Becker (ndbecker2_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-12-23 09:20:38

Gordon Woodhull wrote:

> 
> On Dec 22, 2008, at 1:47 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
> 
>> I'm interested in something like constrained, but applied to a
>> vector of values.  The case I'm interested in is a homogeneous
>> vector of bounded int values, with bounds set at runtime.
>>
>> It is trivial to have a vector<bounded<int> >, but this would not be
>> space efficient in the case where the policies, bounds on all the
>> values are the same.
> 
> Not as general, but possible right now: use bounded with the bounds as
> static members.  This gives you as many classes of constraints as you
> care to spell out.  Example follows.
> 

Interesting example.  IIUC, though, what I need is run-time bounds and the example is compile-time.