Subject: Re: [boost] Proposal: Add Loki Library's SafeFormat to Boost:
From: Sebastian Redl (sebastian.redl_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-01-02 12:32:42
Robert Ramey wrote:
> Actually, this thread started with the idea that spirit::karma
> (or whatever it is) should be considered as an alternative to
> including a separate logging library in boost.
No, it didn't. The logging thread is entirely separate and has
absolutely nothing to do with this one. This thread started about
adopting Loki.SafeFormat, which is similar to Boost.Format.
> 2) the fact that no one looking to see if boost had a logging
> library would be expected to find "sprite::karma".
A good thing Karma is a text manipulation library then, as is all of Spirit.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk