Re: [boost] Proposal: Add Loki Library's SafeFormat to Boost:

Subject: Re: [boost] Proposal: Add Loki Library's SafeFormat to Boost:
From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-01-02 15:55:26

whoops, let me rephrase that:

Actually, this thread started with the idea that spirit::karma
(or whatever it is) should be considered as an alternative to
 including Loki.SafeFormat in boost.

...

2) the fact that no one looking to see if boost had a safe
formating library library would be expected to find "sprite::karma".

Robert Ramey

Sebastian Redl wrote:
> Robert Ramey wrote:
>> Actually, this thread started with the idea that spirit::karma
>> (or whatever it is) should be considered as an alternative to
>> including a separate logging library in boost.
> No, it didn't. The logging thread is entirely separate and has
> absolutely nothing to do with this one. This thread started about
> adopting Loki.SafeFormat, which is similar to Boost.Format.
>> 2) the fact that no one looking to see if boost had a logging
>> library would be expected to find "sprite::karma".
> A good thing Karma is a text manipulation library then, as is all of
> Spirit.
>
> Sebastian
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost