Subject: Re: [boost] C++03 unique_ptr emulation
From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-01-03 13:28:38
On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 11:08 AM, Howard Hinnant <hinnant_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On Jan 3, 2009, at 10:51 AM, Sebastian Redl wrote:
>> Howard Hinnant wrote:
>>> Although I've been running tests, I don't really yet have a neatly
>>> packaged test suite. Part of the problem is that many of the tests
>>> are "must fail" and I don't know of a portable/automated way to handle
>>> that kind of test. Has boost addressed "must fail" tests?
>> Isn't that what compile-fail Jam instructions are for? Just remember to
>> put each test case in its own file, or failures will be masked.
> I've never used Jam before. I'll take a look.
It is a lot of work to gain even a moderately deep understanding of
bjam, but if you treat it like magic, some of the simpler incantations
are very easy to learn. compile-fail tests fall in the simple
In https://svn.boost.org/svn/boost/sandbox/chrono, take a look at
libs/chrono/test/Jamfile.v2 and ratio_fail_test1.cpp.
If I run "bjam --toolset gcc", note that the test is reported as
"**passed**", because there were compile errors.
Temporarily change ratio_fail_test1.cpp so that the ratio multiply
doesn't overflow, and the compile will work but the test will be
reported as failing
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk