Subject: [boost] [spirit] New Header Structure [was Re: Proposal: Add Loki Library's SafeFormat to Boost:]
From: Joel de Guzman (joel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-01-03 23:30:59
Joel de Guzman wrote:
> Robert Ramey wrote:
>>> It seems you haven't really tried to know more beyond the name(s).
>>> Except for spririt 1.6, our recipe is similar to what was done.
>>> "Classic" Spirit will not, I repeat: will not, go away anytimne soon.
>>> It is, and will be, in the namespace "classic". This is the technical
>>> rationale behind the "baroque" include paths. We want 100% backward
>>> compatibility while at the same time usher in the new generation.
>> I realize that, I'm just letting you know that it was failure.
> Again: post a minimal cpp file that exhibits the problem you mention.
> If you've done so, we would have corrected it, instead of you
> "wasting" your time.
Robert, I'm still waiting for you to post a minimal cpp file
that exhibits the problem you mention. You just can't say
our attempt was a failure without detailing exactly why
and then just drop the ball.
-- Joel de Guzman http://www.boostpro.com http://spirit.sf.net
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk