Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] Proposal: Add Loki Library's SafeFormat to Boost:
From: Joel de Guzman (joel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-01-02 12:44:53

Robert Ramey wrote:
> Joel de Guzman wrote:

>>> Now, it looks like spirit is going to be "upgraded" how
>>> will this effect the current code?
>> You do not have to lift a finger. The new code is 100% backward
>> compatible.
> LOL - If that were the case, I wouldn't have changed anything
>> No way to know. How
>> No need to know.
>> It seems you haven't really tried to know more beyond the name(s).
>> Except for spririt 1.6, our recipe is similar to what was done.
>> "Classic" Spirit will not, I repeat: will not, go away anytimne soon.
>> It is, and will be, in the namespace "classic". This is the technical
>> rationale behind the "baroque" include paths. We want 100% backward
>> compatibility while at the same time usher in the new generation.
> I realize that, I'm just letting you know that it was failure.

Again: post a minimal cpp file that exhibits the problem you mention.
If you've done so, we would have corrected it, instead of you
"wasting" your time.


Joel de Guzman

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at