Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [lexical_cast] A suggestion
From: Alexander Nasonov (alnsn_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-01-13 11:29:17

Neil Groves <neil <at>> writes:

> I see that if we need to handle an error condition then the ability to
> return an optional<Target> is a good plan. Perhaps two new overloads would
> be optimal?

This looks interesting but boost::optional<T> is already InputStreamable:
#include <boost/optional/optional_io.hpp>


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at