Subject: Re: [boost] [uitility/result_of] CodeGear support of result_of
From: siliconman (siliconman_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-01-16 20:05:40
In article <E3FFB208-D69C-407B-B536-DC66617981A3_at_[hidden]>,
Daniel Walker <daniel.j.walker_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> When did codegear begin decltype support? The current codegear config
> header configures Boost to assume decltype for all versions, which
> seems suspect.
0x610 which is the first version that has __CODEGEARC__ defined.
anything earlier would be the old __BORLANDC_ defines.
> If codegear supports decltype well enough to configure Boost to use
> it, but not well enough to enable a C++0x-style result_of
> implementation, we could revert to the old result_of for the specific
> codegear version until someone finds a workaround or codegear's C++0x
> support matures. I don't have access to codegear myself.
I'm willing to try out any patches.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk