Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] A set of individual libraries vs. One big library
From: Anis Benyelloul (anis.benyelloul_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-01-20 08:15:16


David Abrahams <dave <at> boostpro.com> writes:
>
> There is already work underway:
> https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/wiki/CMakeModularizeLibrary

Awesome... The part talking about having each library
(source+tests+headers+doc+manifest_describing_depedencies) in its own dedicated
directory is exactly what I meant.

PS. But the page talks about using CMake (i.e replacing bjam???) Aren't we
mixing two problems? (the build system used vs. the way libraries are organized)


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk