Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] A set of individual libraries vs. One big library
From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-01-20 10:01:02

on Tue Jan 20 2009, Anis Benyelloul <> wrote:

> David Abrahams <dave <at>> writes:
>> There is already work underway:
> Awesome... The part talking about having each library
> (source+tests+headers+doc+manifest_describing_depedencies) in its own dedicated
> directory is exactly what I meant.
> PS. But the page talks about using CMake (i.e replacing bjam???) Aren't we
> mixing two problems? (the build system used vs. the way libraries are organized)

Yes, but it's just a matter of necessity driving progress. The
reorganization described there is something we have to do in order to
get the CMake system to act as we'd like.

Dave Abrahams
BoostPro Computing

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at