Subject: Re: [boost] A set of individual libraries vs. One big library
From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-01-20 10:01:38
on Tue Jan 20 2009, "Thomas Klimpel" <Thomas.Klimpel-AT-synopsys.com> wrote:
> Anis Benyelloul wrote:
>> PS. But the page talks about using CMake (i.e replacing bjam???)
> Aren't we
>> mixing two problems? (the build system used vs. the way libraries are
> I guess CMake is not as powerful as bjam, and therefore requires the
> libraries to be more modularized.
Not really. It's just much, much better that way... as it is for bjam.
-- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://boostpro.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk