Subject: Re: [boost] Vault: still needed?
From: vicente.botet (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-01-22 15:36:41
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Abrahams" <dave_at_[hidden]>
To: "boost" <boost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 8:21 PM
Subject: [boost] Vault: still needed?
> Hi All,
> For some time now, Boostpro Computing has been hosting the Boost file
> valut, but now that Boost has a great Subversion host I'm beginning to
> wonder whether the vault is still needed. What's the case for holding
> onto it when people could just check their speculative work into the
> sandbox and subsequently merge smoothly into the Boost trunk if it is
I think that most of the libraries that you find in the sandbox do not include the html documentation, while the compressed files in the Vault include them. I see authors that store several versions of its libraries. If Boost.Vault have problems with the space we should preserv the last version of each library and remove the old ones.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk